暗号通貨の永続的な規制体制を構築する場合、詳細が重要であり、創設者にとってシンプルさが最も重要です。今週、@paradigmと@multicoincap、@RibbitCapital、@galaxyhq、@chainlink、@ElectricCapital、@tribecapの友人たちは、このことを強調する共同書簡を提出しました。👇🏼
Dan Robinson
Dan Robinson8月7日 23:38
We sent a letter this week to the Senate Banking Committee, in response to their draft of crypto market structure legislation. On the critical question of which tokens should be regulated as securities, the Senate's draft takes a very different approach from the CLARITY Act that was already passed in the House. We think the Senate's approach—"ancillary assets"—is better for crypto. While both bills are an improvement on the Howey-based regime—which is notoriously difficult to apply and creates toxic perverse incentives for issuers—the Senate draft is significantly simpler, and avoids forcing decentralized tokens and protocols to fit themselves into an inflexible legislative framework. Instead, it protects against abuse with a simple exclusion—assets that come with legal rights to specified financial interests do not qualify as ancillary assets. As we explain in the letter, we think this is the cleanest test that protects decentralized crypto assets while preventing traditional securities issuers from improperly taking advantage of this framework.
2.92K